View global case map

Indigenous association works to secure land rights and sustainably manage natural resources

Guyana South and Southcentral Rupununi

The South Central People’s Development Association (SCPDA) is a federation of 17 indigenous Wapichan communities in Guyana that works to  secure indigenous land rights and promote socioecological resilience. 

Nature-based Intervention:

To support efforts to secure land rights and the sustainable use of natural resources, the South Central People’s Development Association (SCPDA) have developed a ‘living digital map’ of their traditional lands, created by community mapping teams using field research, smart phones, GPS units, and a drone. These methods and resulting map are then used to detect deforestation and other environmental damage caused by illegal logging and mining in their territories. In parallel, a Common Land Use Plan, adopted by all 17 villages, builds on local traditional knowledge to guide the communities to sustainably manage and conserve their natural resources. As part of the plan, community-conserved areas were established and inter-community agreements on the use of natural resources in Wapichan territories were brokered. A proposal has been submitted to create a 1.4 million-hectare Wapichan Conserved Forest area, which is currently being complemented by over 100 community-conserved areas established to protect key sites for ecological, cultural, and spiritual heritage. Moreover, explicit actions have reportedly been taken in service of climate change adaptation to risks such as prolonged dry seasons and drought including community-based fire management agreements and altered farming methods.

Overview of context and outcomes:

The Wapichan community territory in Guyana represents one of the most biologically rich and diverse areas within the country.

Case effectiveness on

Climate change

Mitigation: Positive

Through the creation of territorial maps that are used to make land tenure claims, as well as community-conserved areas, the Wapichan communities can reportedly better control and denounce deforestation and illegal logging on their territories. Moreover, alternative farming practices to shifting cultivation have been supported, such as ‘savannah farming’, which are meant to contribute less to deforestation.

Adaptation: Not reported

While not explicitly reported, the SCPDA is taking adaptive actions such as adjusting traditional practices and implementing new resource-use rules to address the effects of climate change which include increased drought and reduced water availability. For example, Wapichan villages are drafting community-based fire control agreements for the development of a fire management plan in the savannah areas, including reactivation of the customary practices for the safe use of fire that minimizes burning during the dry season.

Ecosystem health

Ecological effect: Not reported

Although not quantitatively reported, community conserved areas and sustainable land-use plans reportedly resulted in the protection of key ecological sites, benefiting ecosystem integrity and biodiversity. For example, reforestation efforts along the Kokcha river contributed to water conservation in the district, according to a project report.

Socioeconomic outcomes

While more secure land tenure serves to empower the local indigenous communities, the adaptation activities supported by the SCPDA reportedly also help to further enhance the food and water security of the communities while also employing local people.


The the South Central People’s Development Association acts as the main governing body for the project representing the indigenous Wapichan communities. A Common Land Use Plan is used as the main governance agreement in regards to landscape scale planning between the 17 villages.


The program was financially supported by the Forest Peoples Programme, Digital Democracy, The Size of Wales and the UNDP-Implemented GEF Small Grants Programme.

Monitoring and evaluation

The program has implemented extensive and innovative natural resource monitoring techniques in collaboration with local villagers. They utilize smart phones, field visits, and drones to watch over local lands and track any illegal use of the community’s natural resources.

Trade-offs and limitations

The land rights of the Wapichan people have not yet been fully recognized resulting in their lands being under constant pressure from external development for logging, roads, mining, and agriculture.

PDF   Close case
A tree and hill in background
Photo © Joshue Gobin

Intervention type

  • Management
  • Protection
Conducted at landscape scale

Ecosystem type

  • Tropical & subtropical forests
  • Tropical & subtropical grasslands
  • Terrestrial production
  • Wetlands

Climate change impacts addressed

  • Decreasing wet season
  • Drought
  • Longer dry season
  • Reduced water availability


  • Other
  • Local NGO or CBO (eg. indigenous)

Societal challenges

  • Climate change adaptation
  • Climate change mitigation
  • Rights/empowerment/equality


  • Food security: Not reported
  • Water security: Positive
  • Health: Not reported
  • Local economics: Positive
  • Livelihoods/goods/basic needs: Not reported
  • Energy security: Not reported
  • Disaster risk reduction: Not reported
  • Rights/empowerment/equality: Positive
  • Conflict and security: Not reported
  • No. developmental outcomes reported: 5


Read resource 1

Literature info

  • Grey literature
Case methodology not reported